answer：Okay, so I need to figure out which ending fits best with the given context. Let me read through the context again: "The boy hands the toothbrush to someone. The boy dances his feet on a wood floor. toothpaste." Then there are four options: A, B, C, D.Hmm, the context is about a boy and a toothbrush. He hands it to someone, then dances on a wood floor. Then it mentions toothpaste. So, the next action should logically follow from that.Option A: "is taken from a bottle and collected outside." That doesn't seem to fit because after handing the toothbrush, taking toothpaste from a bottle and collecting it outside doesn't directly relate to the boy's actions.Option B: "is applied to the toothbrush and handed to the boy." Wait, the boy already handed the toothbrush to someone. If toothpaste is applied and then handed back, that makes sense. Maybe the someone is putting toothpaste on it and giving it back.Option C: "splashes his hand." That seems a bit out of context. Splashing hand with toothpaste doesn't fit well with the dancing and handing the toothbrush.Option D: "is brushed in a bowl." Brushing toothpaste in a bowl doesn't make much sense. Usually, you brush your teeth, not the toothpaste in a bowl.So, putting it together, the boy hands the toothbrush to someone, then dances. The next logical step is that the someone applies toothpaste to the toothbrush and hands it back. So, option B seems to fit best.

answer：Okay, so I need to come up with a question and reasoning that justifies the answer: 1901 to 1910, and sometimes extended to include the 1890s to the First World War. Hmm, let's think about what time periods are being referred to here. The main period is 1901-1910, which is the early 20th century. The extended period goes from the 1890s to the First World War, which would be roughly 1890 to 1918. So, the question should be about a historical period that is typically defined as 1901-1910 but can be expanded to include surrounding years for a broader view.What historical term or concept covers this timeframe? The Edwardian era comes to mind. Edward VII reigned from 1901 to 1910, so that fits the main period. But sometimes, people include the late Victorian era (which ended in 1901) and the early years of World War I (1914-1918) to give a more comprehensive view of the social, political, and economic changes of the time.So, the question could be about the Edwardian era and its extended timeframe. The reasoning would explain that while the Edwardian era is officially 1901-1910, historians often look at the preceding decade (1890s) and the period up to World War I to understand the broader trends and transitions, such as the shift from Victorian values to the modern era, technological advancements, and the lead-up to the war.I should structure the answer clearly, first stating the main period and then explaining the extended timeframe, giving reasons like historical context, trends, and key events that make the broader period relevant.

answer：First, let's define the variables:- Let P be the marks obtained in Physics.- Let C be the marks obtained in Chemistry.- Let M be the marks obtained in Mathematics.According to the problem, the total marks in Physics, Chemistry, and Mathematics is 130 more than the marks in Physics alone. This can be written as:P + C + M = P + 130By simplifying this equation, we can subtract P from both sides:C + M = 130The average marks obtained in Chemistry and Mathematics is the sum of these two subjects divided by 2:Average = (C + M) / 2 = 130 / 2 = 65Therefore, the average mark obtained in Chemistry and Mathematics is 65.

answer：Okay, so I need to determine whether the given review is positive or negative. Let me read through it carefully.The title is "The Queen," which sounds respectful and positive. The review itself says, "She has evolved as a Jazz Singer! I love the way she has transcend into the woman she is today! Keep on grooving honey!" Breaking it down, the reviewer mentions that she has "evolved" as a jazz singer, which implies growth and improvement. The use of "love" is a strong positive indicator. They also express admiration for her transformation into the woman she is today, which is another positive statement. The closing line, "Keep on grooving honey!" is an encouraging and supportive message, which is definitely positive.There are no negative words or phrases here. Everything points towards the reviewer being very satisfied and impressed with the jazz singer. So, putting it all together, this review is clearly positive.

answer：Alright, so I'm trying to figure out whether the claim "I drank the rest of the Video art that was on the poster board." is true. Let me break this down step by step.First, I know that video art is a form of digital or visual art that's typically displayed on screens, like TVs or monitors. It's not something physical that you can hold or consume. So, the idea of drinking video art doesn't make much sense because it's not a liquid or a substance. You can't consume it in that way.Next, the claim mentions that the video art was on a poster board. A poster board is usually a large, flat surface used to display printed materials, like posters or artwork. It's made of paper or cardboard and isn't something you can drink from either. So, even if the video art were somehow on a poster board, the act of drinking it still wouldn't be possible because it's not a liquid.Putting it all together, the sentence is mixing two things that don't go together: drinking and video art on a poster. Since video art isn't a drinkable substance and a poster board isn't a container for liquids, the claim doesn't make sense. It's a bit of a nonsensical statement because it's combining unrelated concepts.I'm also thinking about the structure of the sentence. It says "I drank the rest of the Video art that was on the poster board." The verb "drank" implies consumption, which is typically associated with liquids. Video art, being a visual medium, doesn't fit into that category. So, grammatically, it's correct, but contextually, it's impossible.Maybe the person is trying to be metaphorical, but even then, the metaphor doesn't hold up because drinking something implies ingestion, which isn't applicable to video art. So, whether taken literally or metaphorically, the claim doesn't hold water.I don't think there's any scenario where this statement would be true. Video art is meant to be viewed, not consumed. So, the answer should be no, the claim isn't true.

answer：Alright, I need to translate the given English text into Oriya without adding or omitting any information. Let me start by carefully reading each sentence to understand the context and nuances.First sentence: "CPWD has already started the work in EPC mode and the press shall be ready by January, 2020." I'll translate this to Oriya, ensuring that terms like "EPC mode" are accurately conveyed.Next, there's a part in Oriya: "ମୁଁ ଏହା ମଧ୍ୟ ଉଲ୍ଲେଖ କରିବାକୁ ଚାହୁଁଛି କି, ସଂରକ୍ଷଣ ନେଇ ବ୍ୟାପକ ଗୁଜବ ପ୍ରସାରିତ ହେଉଛି, ଯାହାକି ମିଥ୍ୟା ଏବଂ ଭିତ୍ତିହୀନ ।" I'll make sure this is correctly translated or if it's already in Oriya, I'll leave it as is.Then, there's another Oriya line: "ମି. ), କାଳୀ ନଦୀ- N -52 (53 କି." I'll check if this needs translation or if it's already in the target language.Lastly, the longer English sentence about the Union Cabinet and the MoU. I'll translate this accurately, ensuring that all specific terms like "Memorandum of Understanding" and "South Asian Seas Region" are correctly rendered in Oriya.I'll go through each part step by step, ensuring clarity and faithfulness to the original text.