Appearance
question：Instructions: You are given a target person and two sentences. Your task is to determine whether the second sentence conveys either a stereotype, anti-stereotype, or is unrelated with respect to the first sentence and the target. A stereotype is a widely held but oversimplified notion of a group of people. An anti-stereotype is an idea that goes against the widely held but oversimplified notion of a group of people. Sentences and targets are unrelated if there is no relevance between them.Input: Target: mommy The boy thought his mommy would refuse to let him go to the playground. We went shopping for shoes and found some great platform pumps.Output:
answer：Okay, so I'm trying to figure out whether the second sentence conveys a stereotype, anti-stereotype, or is unrelated to the first sentence and the target "mommy." Let me break this down step by step.First, I'll look at the first sentence: "The boy thought his mommy would refuse to let him go to the playground." Here, the target is "mommy," and the context is about a boy expecting his mom to say no to him going to the playground. This could imply that the mom is protective or strict, which are common stereotypes about moms being overprotective.Now, the second sentence is: "We went shopping for shoes and found some great platform pumps." This sentence talks about shopping for shoes, specifically platform pumps, which are a type of footwear. At first glance, this doesn't seem to relate directly to the role or characteristics of a "mommy." There's no mention of parenting, childcare, or any typical mom-related activities here.I'm trying to see if there's any indirect connection. Maybe platform pumps are associated with a certain style that moms might like? But that's a stretch. The sentence is more about shopping for shoes, which is a general activity and not specifically tied to any stereotype or anti-stereotype about moms. It doesn't challenge any common notion about moms either.So, considering all this, the second sentence doesn't seem to relate to the first sentence or the target "mommy" in terms of stereotypes or anti-stereotypes. It's just a separate statement about shopping, which doesn't provide any information that would support or contradict any widely held beliefs about moms.
question：Given the task definition and input, reply with output. In this task, you will be presented with a question having multiple possible answers in Portuguese language. And you should choose a most suitable option out of "A", "B", "C", "D", and "E" based on your commonsense knowledge.Question: Antes dos computadores ou telemóveis, um dicionário era uma ferramenta importante para professores e estudantes no quê? Options: A manual B sala de aula C explicar o significado das palavras D quadro E prateleira
answer：Okay, so I've got this question here in Portuguese, and I need to figure out the right answer. Let me start by breaking it down. The question is asking about what a dictionary was used for by teachers and students before computers or mobile phones. The options are A to E, each in Portuguese.First, I'll translate the question to understand it better. It says, "Before computers or mobile phones, a dictionary was an important tool for teachers and students in what?" So, the key here is understanding the context of a dictionary's use before digital tools were common.Now, looking at the options:A. manual - which means "manual" or "handbook"B. sala de aula - "classroom"C. explicar o significado das palavras - "to explain the meaning of words"D. quadro - "board"E. prateleira - "shelf"I need to think about what a dictionary was primarily used for. Dictionaries are mainly for looking up word meanings, right? So, teachers and students would use them to explain or understand the meanings of words. That makes me think option C is about explaining word meanings, which seems relevant.But wait, let me consider each option more carefully. Option B is "classroom." While dictionaries are used in classrooms, the question is asking what they were used for, not where. So B might not be the best fit.Option A, "manual," doesn't quite fit because a dictionary isn't a manual; it's more of a reference book.Option D, "board," doesn't make much sense because a dictionary isn't a board. Maybe if they wrote on a board using the dictionary, but that's a stretch.Option E, "shelf," is where you might keep a dictionary, but again, the question is about the purpose, not the location.So, circling back, the main function of a dictionary is to explain word meanings. Therefore, option C seems to be the correct answer because it directly relates to the primary use of a dictionary in educational settings before digital tools were available.
question：Come up with a question and reasoning that would justify this answer: 54Question and rationale: The question is: Silvia’s bakery is offering 10% on advanced orders over 50.00. She orders 2 quiches for 15.00 each, 6 croissants at 3.00 each and 6 buttermilk biscuits for 2.00 each. How much will her order be with the discount?Step-by-step reasoning process: She orders 2 quiches for 15.00 each so they cost 2 * 15 = 30.00. She orders 6 croissants at 3.00 each so they cost 6 * 2.5 = 18.00. She orders 6 biscuits at 2.00 each so they cost 6 * 2 = 12.00. Her advance order is 30 + 18 + 12 = 60.00. Her advance order is over 50.00 so she can get 10% off so .10 * 60 = 6.00. Her order is 60.00 and she gets 6.00 off so her advanced order will cost 60 - 6 = 54.00.Come up with a question and reasoning that would justify this answer: 3Question and rationale: The question is: Stacy went to a store to buy some pairs of shorts. Each pair normally cost 10, but there's a discount of 10% on the total cost for people who purchase 3 or more pairs at once. How much can she save by buying 3 pairs at once as opposed to purchasing them individually at different times?Step-by-step reasoning process: Without the discount, each pair cost 10 so 3 pairs cost 3 * 10 = 30. With a discount of 10% on the total cost, she can pay only 30 - (30 * (10 / 100)) = 27. By buying 3 at once in order to get the discount, she can save 30 - 27 = 3.Come up with a question and reasoning that would justify this answer: 28Question and rationale: The question is: One student on a field trip counted 12 squirrels. Another counted a third more squirrels than the first student. How many squirrels did both students count combined?Step-by-step reasoning process: The second student counted 12 / 3 = 4 more squirrels than the first student. The second student counted 12 + 4 = 16 squirrels. Together, the first and second student counted 12 + 16 = 28 squirrels combined.Come up with a question and reasoning that would justify this answer: 333200Question and rationale:
answer：First, I need to determine the total number of books in the library. There are 1,200 bookshelves, and each shelf holds 280 books. Multiplying these together gives the total number of books.Next, I'll calculate the total number of books that need to be moved. Since 30% of the books are being relocated, I'll find 30% of the total number of books.Finally, to find out how many books remain in the library after the move, I'll subtract the number of books being moved from the total number of books.
question：QUESTION: Premise: "A distracted little boy waiting for his soccer game to begin."Hypothesis: "A boy ready to win his first game."Is the hypothesis entailed by the premise?Options:- yes- it is not possible to tell- noSOLUTION: Let's solve this gradually. Waiting for his game to begin doesn't imply being ready to win.Answer is it is not possible to tell.QUESTION: Premise: "Three adults wearing cold weather gear."Hypothesis: "It is snowing."Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?SOLUTION: Let's solve this gradually. Just because it is cold weather it does not mean it is snowing.Answer is it is not possible to tell.QUESTION: Given the sentence "Two people sit on a dock next to each other watching the sunset." is it true that "Two people are inside playing a game of chess."?SOLUTION: Let's solve this gradually. On a dock watching the sunset implies that the people are outside while inside playing a game of chess implies the are indoors.Answer is no.QUESTION: Premise: "A lady looks at the camera with a group of people."Hypothesis: "The woman is yelling at her child in the car."Do we know that the hypothesis entailed by the premise?SOLUTION:
answer：Okay, so I'm trying to figure out if the hypothesis is entailed by the premise. The premise is "A lady looks at the camera with a group of people." The hypothesis is "The woman is yelling at her child in the car." First, I need to understand what each part means. The premise describes a scene where a lady is looking at a camera, and there are other people around her. It could be a photo or a video, maybe a group picture. The lady is the focus here, and she's with a group, but nothing else is specified about what's happening.Now, the hypothesis is a different scenario. It says the woman is yelling at her child in a car. That's a specific action—yelling—and a specific setting, which is inside a car. I need to see if the premise gives any information that would lead to the conclusion in the hypothesis. The premise doesn't mention anything about a car, a child, or yelling. It just says she's looking at the camera with a group. So, there's no connection between the two scenarios. Maybe someone could think that if she's with a group, one of them might be her child, but the premise doesn't specify that. Also, looking at a camera doesn't imply she's yelling. She could be smiling, posing, or just looking normally. So, without any information about a car, a child, or yelling, the premise doesn't support the hypothesis. They're talking about two different situations. Therefore, the answer should be that the hypothesis is not entailed by the premise.
question：Q: Mica went to the grocery store and bought 2 kilograms of pasta that costs 1.5; 1/4 kilogram of ground beef costs 8 for 1 kilogram; two jars of pasta sauce costs 2 per jar. Mica also wants to buy a 6 Quesadilla for snacks. How much money should she have with her to buy all those?A: Two kilograms of pasta cost 1.5 x 2 = 3. One - fourth kilogram of ground beef cost 8 x 1 / 4 = 2. Two jars of pasta sauce cost 2 x 2 = 4. The total cost for the pasta, beef, and sauce is 3 + 2 + 4 = 9. Since Mica also wants to buy Quesadilla, she should have 9 + 6 = 15. The answer is 15.Question: Four small panda bears and five bigger panda bears eat 25 pounds and 40 pounds of fresh bamboo sprouts every day, respectively. How many pounds of bamboo do the 9 pandas eat in a week?Answer: The small panda bears eat a total of 4 x 25 = 100 pounds of bamboo every day. The bigger panda bears eat a total of 5 x 40 = 200 pounds of bamboo every day. So, the 9 pandas eat a total of 100 + 200 = 300 pounds of bamboo every day. Therefore, they eat a total of 300 x 7 = 2100 pounds in a week. The answer is 2100.[Question]The leak in Jerry's roof drips 3 drops a minute into the pot he put under it. Each drop is 20 ml, and the pot holds 3 liters. How long will it take the pot to be full?[Answer]First find the pot's volume in ml: 3 liters * 1000 ml / liter = 3000 ml. Then find the number of ml that enter the pot per minute: 3 drops / minute * 20 ml / drop = 60 ml / minute. Then divide the volume of the pot by the volume that enters it every minute: 3000 ml / 60 ml / minute = 50 minutes. The answer is 50.Q: Julieta went to the store to buy a backpack and three ring-binders for her school supplies. She knew the backpack was 50, and each ring-binder cost was 20. However, at the store, she found out that the price of a back had increased by 5, and the price of a ring-binder had reduced by 2. Calculate the total amount of money Julieta spent at the store.A: Initially, a backpack cost was 50; when it increased by 5, the price became 50 + 5 = 55. The price of a ring - binder 20, when it reduced by 2, the price became 20 - 2 = 18. If she wanted to buy 3 ring - binders, she spent 18 * 3 = 54. In total, Julieta spent 55 + 54 = 109. The answer is 109.Question: A group of researchers are studying a colony of penguins. Their results show that the size doubled in the first year they watched the colony, then tripled in the next year. This year, however, harsh conditions meant the colony only gained 129 penguins. The colony has 1077 penguins in it now. Each penguin eats one and a half fish every day. How many fish did the whole colony catch per day to eat at the beginning of the first year?Answer: The colony had 1077 - 129 = 948 penguins in it at the beginning of this year. At the beginning of the second year, the colony had 948 / 3 = 316 penguins in it. At the beginning of the first year, it had 316 / 2 = 158 penguins in it. Thus, at the beginning of the first year, the penguin colony was catching 158 * 1 1 / 2 = 237 fish per day. The answer is 237.Q: A plumber is trying to decide which of three different jobs he should take to make the most money. The first job involves fixing three toilets and three sinks at an apartment complex. The second involves two toilets and five sinks at a different apartment complex. The third involves fixing one toilet, two showers and three sinks at a third apartment complex. If the plumber charges 30 to fix a sink, 40 to fix a shower and 50 to fix a toilet, what is the most money the plumber can earn if he can only choose one of these three jobs?A:
answer：First, calculate the earnings for each job by multiplying the number of each type of repair by its respective rate.For the first job:- Fixing 3 toilets: 3 × 50 = 150- Fixing 3 sinks: 3 × 30 = 90- Total for the first job: 150 + 90 = 240For the second job:- Fixing 2 toilets: 2 × 50 = 100- Fixing 5 sinks: 5 × 30 = 150- Total for the second job: 100 + 150 = 250For the third job:- Fixing 1 toilet: 1 × 50 = 50- Fixing 2 showers: 2 × 40 = 80- Fixing 3 sinks: 3 × 30 = 90- Total for the third job: 50 + 80 + 90 = 220Comparing the totals, the second job offers the highest earnings at 250.
question：Given the task definition and input, reply with output. You are given a sentence in English. Your job is to translate the English sentence into Japanese.Well, you know, our own Earth has oxygen in the atmosphere to 20 percent by volume.
answer：Alright, I need to translate the given English sentence into Japanese. Let me start by understanding the sentence structure and the key points.The sentence is: "Well, you know, our own Earth has oxygen in the atmosphere to 20 percent by volume."Breaking it down:- "Well, you know," is an introductory phrase, often used to set the tone or draw attention.- "our own Earth" refers to Earth, emphasizing possession or belonging.- "has oxygen in the atmosphere" indicates the presence of oxygen in the Earth's atmosphere.- "to 20 percent by volume" specifies the concentration of oxygen.Now, translating each part:- "Well, you know," can be translated as "まあ、知っての通りですが、" which is a common way to start a sentence in Japanese to draw attention or introduce a known fact.- "our own Earth" would be "地球" (Earth) with an emphasis on possession, but in Japanese, possession is often implied without the need for "our own." So it can be simply "地球は."- "has oxygen in the atmosphere" translates to "大気中に酸素を含有しています。" Here, "含有しています" means "contains" or "has."- "to 20 percent by volume" is "20パーセント含有しています。" The term "by volume" is often omitted in Japanese when the context is clear, especially in scientific contexts where percentages are understood as volume percentages.Putting it all together, the sentence would be: "まあ、知っての通りですが、地球は大気中に酸素を20パーセント含有しています。"I should double-check the translation to ensure it's accurate and natural in Japanese. The structure flows well, and the scientific terms are correctly used. The introductory phrase sets the tone appropriately, and the percentages are clearly stated.I think this translation effectively conveys the original meaning while adhering to Japanese sentence structure and conventions.