answer：Okay, so I need to figure out who played Peter in the 1992 film "Peter's Friends." Let me start by recalling what I know about the movie. From the context provided, it's about six friends who were part of an acting troupe from Cambridge University. They graduated in 1982 and went their separate ways. Ten years later, Peter invites them to spend New Year's with him at his inherited estate. Peter has a secret that shocks everyone.Now, the question is specifically asking who played Peter. The context mentions that Peter is portrayed by Stephen Fry. Wait, but I'm not entirely sure if that's correct. I know Stephen Fry is a well-known actor, and he's been in several films and TV shows. But I'm trying to remember if he was in "Peter's Friends." Alternatively, maybe it's someone else.Let me think about other actors from that time. The film came out in 1992, so it's a bit older. I remember that Emma Thompson was in some of her earlier films around that time, but I don't think she played Peter. Maybe Hugh Laurie? He was also active then, but I'm not certain. Alternatively, perhaps it's someone like Rupert Everett or John Hannah, but I'm not sure.Wait, the context actually says Peter is played by Stephen Fry. So maybe that's the answer. But I want to double-check. I think Stephen Fry did play Peter in that film. He's known for his roles in "The Fry and Laurie Show" and other comedies, but he's also done dramatic roles. "Peter's Friends" is a drama, so that fits.Alternatively, maybe it's someone else. I'm a bit confused because I also remember a movie called "Four Weddings and a Funeral" with Hugh Grant, but that's a different film. So, going back, the context clearly states that Peter is played by Stephen Fry. Therefore, the answer should be Stephen Fry.But just to be thorough, I'll try to recall any other information. The film is about six friends, so the cast likely includes several well-known British actors. I think Simon Callow was in it as well, playing one of the friends. But the main character is Peter, so the focus is on him. Since the context mentions Stephen Fry as Peter, I think that's correct.I don't think I've heard of another actor playing Peter in that specific film. So, putting it all together, the answer is Stephen Fry.

answer：Okay, I need to solve this problem where I'm given a list of lists of numbers, and I have to sum up the values at each position across all the inner lists. The output should be a list where each element is the sum of the corresponding elements from each inner list. If an inner list is shorter than others, those positions beyond its length are just not added for that list. The output list should be as long as the longest inner list.Let me think about how to approach this. So, first, I need to find the maximum length among all the inner lists. That will determine how many elements my output list will have. For each position from 0 to max_length-1, I need to go through each inner list and add the element at that position if it exists.Wait, but how do I handle cases where some inner lists are shorter than others? For example, if the first inner list has 5 elements, the second has 3, the third has 7, then the output should have 7 elements. For the first position, I sum all the first elements of each inner list. For the fourth position, I sum the fourth elements of the inner lists that have at least four elements.So, the steps I need to take are:1. Determine the maximum length of the inner lists. Let's call it max_len.2. Initialize a result list with max_len zeros.3. For each index from 0 to max_len - 1: a. Iterate through each inner list. b. If the inner list has an element at this index, add it to the result at this index.4. Return the result list.Let me test this logic with the examples given.First example:Input:[[-45, 79, -28, -45, -45, -40], [-54, -12, 69, 69], [18, 97, 19, -56, 94, -69, -73], [93, -61, 27, 55, -57, 19, 56, -94], [-15, -18, -18], [-31, 65]]The lengths of the inner lists are 6,4,7,8,3,2. So max_len is 8.Now, for each index from 0 to 7:Index 0:Sum all first elements: -45 + (-54) + 18 +93 + (-15) + (-31) = Let's calculate:-45 -54 = -99-99 +18 = -81-81 +93 = 1212 -15 = -3-3 -31 = -34. So first element is -34.Index 1:79 + (-12) +97 + (-61) + (-18) +65.79-12=6767+97=164164-61=103103-18=8585+65=150. So second element is 150.Index 2:-28 +69 +19 +27 + (-18) + (no element for the last two lists, since they have only 2 elements). Wait, the last two lists are [-15,-18,-18] which has 3 elements, so index 2 exists, and [-31,65] which has 2, so index 2 doesn't exist. So for index 2, we sum:-28 +69 +19 +27 + (-18) + (nothing from the last list). Let's compute:-28 +69 =4141+19=6060+27=8787-18=69. So third element is 69.Index 3:-45 +69 + (-56) +55 + (nothing from the fifth list, which has length 3) + (nothing from the last list, which has length 2). So:-45 +69 =2424 -56 =-32-32 +55=23. So fourth element is 23.Index 4:-45 (from first list) +94 (third list) + (-57) (fourth list) + (nothing from others). So:-45 +94=4949-57=-8. Fifth element is -8.Index 5:-40 (first list) + (-69) (third list) +19 (fourth list) + (nothing from others). So:-40 -69 =-109-109 +19 =-90. Sixth element is -90.Index 6:-73 (third list) +56 (fourth list) + (others don't have index 6). So:-73 +56 =-17. Seventh element is -17.Index7:-94 (fourth list). So eighth element is -94.Which matches the example output: [-34, 150, 69, 23, -8, -90, -17, -94].Great, so the logic works for the first example.Another example:Input:[[-26, 18, 66], [-96, -72, 93, 42, 55, -92], [-8, -10], [66, 42, -46, 52, -30, 25, -12, -80, -27], [-93, -96, -38], [41, 5, -60, 7, -52, 43], [99, -31, -3]]The lengths are 3,6,2,9,3,6,3. Max_len is 9.So for each index 0 to 8:Index0: sum all first elements:-26 + (-96) + (-8) +66 + (-93) +41 +99.Let's compute:-26 -96 =-122-122 -8 =-130-130 +66 =-64-64 -93 =-157-157 +41 =-116-116 +99 =-17.So first element is -17.Index1: sum second elements where available.18 + (-72) + (-10) +42 + (-96) +5 + (-31).Compute:18-72=-54-54-10=-64-64+42=-22-22-96=-118-118+5=-113-113-31=-144.Second element is -144.Index2: third elements.66 +93 + (-46) + (-38) + (-60) + (-3).Wait, let's see:First list:66, second:93, third list has length 2, so no third element. Fourth list: -46, fifth list: -38, sixth list: -60, seventh list: -3.So 66+93=159, 159-46=113, 113-38=75, 75-60=15, 15-3=12. Third element is 12.Index3: fourth elements.Only the second list, fourth list, sixth list, and seventh list have fourth elements? Wait, let's check:First list has length 3, so no. Second list has 6 elements, so yes. Third list has 2, no. Fourth list has 9, yes. Fifth list has 3, no. Sixth list has 6, yes. Seventh list has 3, no.So fourth elements are: second list's 42, fourth list's 52, sixth list's 7.So 42 +52 +7 =101. Fourth element is 101.Index4: fifth elements.Second list:55, fourth list:-30, sixth list:-52.So 55-30=25, 25-52=-27. Fifth element is -27.Index5: sixth elements.Second list:-92, fourth list:25, sixth list:43.-92 +25 =-67, -67+43=-24. Sixth element is -24.Index6: seventh elements.Only fourth list has 7th element: -12. So seventh element is -12.Index7: eighth elements.Fourth list has -80. So eighth element is -80.Index8: ninth elements.Fourth list has -27. So ninth element is -27.Which matches the example output.So the logic works.Now, the third example:Input:[[22, -2, -35, -26, 94], [11, 47]]The lengths are 5 and 2. Max_len is 5.So output should have 5 elements.Index0:22+11=33.Index1:-2+47=45.Index2:-35 (only first list has it).Index3:-26 (only first list).Index4:94 (only first list).So output is [33,45,-35,-26,94].Wait, but the example output isn't provided. So I think that's correct.So, to implement this in Python:First, find the maximum length of the inner lists.Then, for each index from 0 to max_len-1, sum the elements at that index across all inner lists, but only if the inner list is long enough.So, code steps:1. Read the input list of lists.2. Compute max_len = max(len(lst) for lst in input_list).3. Initialize result as a list of max_len zeros.4. For each i in range(max_len): a. For each inner_list in input_list: i. If i < len(inner_list), add inner_list[i] to result[i].5. Return result.Now, implement this.Wait, but in Python, how to handle the input? The input is given as a string, but in the examples, it's presented as a list of lists. So perhaps the function will receive a list of lists as the input.But in the problem statement, the user provided examples with the input as a string representation, but in the actual code, perhaps the function will receive the list directly.Assuming that the function is given a list of lists, like the examples.So, code:def sum_inner_lists(input_list): max_len = max(len(lst) for lst in input_list) result = [0] * max_len for i in range(max_len): for lst in input_list: if i < len(lst): result[i] += lst[i] return resultTesting this with the first example:input_list = [[-45, 79, -28, -45, -45, -40], [-54, -12, 69, 69], [18, 97, 19, -56, 94, -69, -73], [93, -61, 27, 55, -57, 19, 56, -94], [-15, -18, -18], [-31, 65]]The function should return [-34, 150, 69, 23, -8, -90, -17, -94], which matches.Another test case:input_list = [[-26, 18, 66], [-96, -72, 93, 42, 55, -92], [-8, -10], [66, 42, -46, 52, -30, 25, -12, -80, -27], [-93, -96, -38], [41, 5, -60, 7, -52, 43], [99, -31, -3]]The function returns [-17, -144, 12, 101, -27, -24, -12, -80, -27], which is correct.Third test case:input_list = [[22, -2, -35, -26, 94], [11, 47]]The function returns [33,45,-35,-26,94], which is correct.So, the code should work.

answer：Okay, so I need to figure out if the word 'docked' appears the same number of times in both sentences. Let me start by looking at each sentence carefully.First, Sentence1 is: 'a man in white shirt and black shorts playing tennis'. I'll go through each word one by one. The words are 'a', 'man', 'in', 'white', 'shirt', 'and', 'black', 'shorts', 'playing', 'tennis'. I don't see the word 'docked' here at all. So the frequency in Sentence1 is 0.Now, Sentence2 is: 'a passenger jet that has been docked to the terminal'. Let me break this down. The words are 'a', 'passenger', 'jet', 'that', 'has', 'been', 'docked', 'to', 'the', 'terminal'. Here, I see the word 'docked' once. So the frequency in Sentence2 is 1.Comparing the two, Sentence1 has 0 occurrences and Sentence2 has 1 occurrence. Since they're not equal, the answer should be 'No'.

answer：Alright, so I've got this task where I need to identify the name of a drug or medicine from a given sentence. The example provided was "Acute pain was observed after taking MTX" and the answer was "MTX." That makes sense because MTX is a known abbreviation for methotrexate, a common medication used in treating conditions like rheumatoid arthritis.Now, looking at the sentence I need to solve: "Psoriasis-like skin reaction in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis after sulphasalazine therapy." My goal is to find the drug mentioned here.First, I'll break down the sentence to understand the context. The patient has rheumatoid arthritis, which is a condition often treated with various medications. The reaction mentioned is a psoriasis-like skin reaction, which occurred after undergoing "sulphasalazine therapy." The key part here is "sulphasalazine therapy." I know that sulphasalazine is a medication commonly used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory conditions. It's an anti-inflammatory drug and also has immunosuppressive properties. So, in this context, it's clear that sulphasalazine is the drug being referred to.I should also consider if there are other possible drugs mentioned, but in this sentence, "sulphasalazine" is the only specific drug name provided. There's no mention of other medications or abbreviations, so it's straightforward.To be thorough, I'll think about whether "sulphasalazine" is a known drug. Yes, it's a well-documented medication, often abbreviated as SSZ. However, in the sentence, it's spelled out fully, so I don't need to worry about abbreviations here.Another point to consider is the structure of the sentence. It mentions a reaction after therapy, which points to the drug causing the reaction. Since the reaction is psoriasis-like, it's a side effect, but the drug causing it is still sulphasalazine.I don't see any other potential drug names in the sentence, so I can confidently say that sulphasalazine is the correct answer here. It fits the context of being a medicine used for rheumatoid arthritis and is explicitly mentioned as the therapy in question.

answer：First, I need to determine how much longer it takes Ann to frost one cake with her sprained wrist compared to her normal time. Normally, she takes 5 minutes per cake, but with the sprained wrist, it takes her 8 minutes per cake. The additional time per cake is 8 minutes minus 5 minutes, which equals 3 minutes extra per cake.Next, I'll calculate the total additional time for frosting 10 cakes. Since each cake takes 3 extra minutes, for 10 cakes, the total additional time would be 3 minutes multiplied by 10, resulting in 30 minutes extra.Therefore, frosting 10 cakes with her sprained wrist would take Ann 30 minutes longer than usual.

answer：Okay, so I need to figure out whether the given review matches the category "drugstore." Let's break it down step by step.First, I'll read the review carefully. The review says: "Product does not work well on windows. If you have lots of sun avoid this product as the sun dries the water spots onto the window. best way to clean your windows is the old way with spray bottle and paper towels."From this, it seems like the product in question is something used for cleaning windows. The user is talking about water spots drying on the window, which suggests they're using a cleaning product meant for windows. They mention that the product doesn't work well, so they're advising against it, especially in sunny conditions. They also recommend using a spray bottle and paper towels as a better method.Now, the category given is "drugstore." Drugstores typically sell a variety of items, including over-the-counter medications, personal care products, household items, and sometimes cleaning supplies. So, window cleaning products could potentially fall under the drugstore category, as they are often sold in such stores.However, I should consider whether the product is specifically a drugstore item or if it's more specialized. Window cleaners are common in drugstores, but sometimes they can also be found in hardware stores or supermarkets. The review doesn't specify where the product was purchased, just that it's a window cleaner.Another point is the mention of using a spray bottle and paper towels as an alternative. Spray bottles are commonly found in drugstores as well, so that aligns with the category.But wait, sometimes window cleaners can be categorized under "home improvement" or "cleaning supplies." So, I need to determine if "drugstore" is the most appropriate category for this product. Since drugstores do carry window cleaning products, it's plausible. However, if the product is a specialized cleaner, it might be more accurately categorized elsewhere.Given that the review is about a window cleaning product and the category is "drugstore," I think it's a match because window cleaners are typically sold in drugstores. Therefore, the category seems appropriate.